27 November 2012
Confocal fluorescence spectroscopy of subcutaneous cartilage expressing green fluorescent protein versus cutaneous collagen autofluorescence
Gareau D.S., Bargo P.R., Horton W.A., Jacques S.L
Optically monitoring the expression of green fluorescent
protein (GFP) in the cartilage underlying the skin of a mouse allows
tracking the expression of the chondrocyte phenotype. This paper
considers how confocal microscopy with spectral detection can sense
GFP fluorescence in the cartilage despite light scattering and collagen
autofluorescence from the overlying skin. An in vivo experiment
tested the abilities of a topical optical fiber measurement and a confocal
microscope measurement to detect GFP in cartilage under the
skin versus the collagen autofluorescence. An ex vivo experiment
tested the ability of a confocal microscope without and with its pinhole
to detect a fluorescent microsphere underneath an ex vivo skin
layer versus the collagen autofluorescence. In both systems, spectroscopic
detection followed by linear analysis allowed spectral discrimination
of collagen autofluorescence (MC) and the subdermal green
fluorescence (MG) due to either GFP or the microsphere. Contrast
was defined as MG /(MG1MC). The in vivo contrast for GFP using
optical fiber and confocal measurements was 0.16 and 0.92, respectively.
The ex vivo contrast for a fluorescent microsphere using a confocal
system without and with a pinhole was 0.13 and 0.48, respectively.
The study demonstrates that a topical optical fiber
measurement is affected by collagen autofluorescence, while a confocal
microscope can detect subdermal fluorescence while rejecting
collagen autofluorescence.